Interested in joining us? Link to our Visitor's Center.
![]() |
| "Ruth and Naomi" by He Qi, from the cover of Yee's book |
EfM invites us to look for ourselves in the scriptures, and also to reflect on our own reactions to what we read. Remember how we responded to the story of Na'aman the Leper from our own perspectives? A soldier among us saw the consequence of disobedience; a soft-spoken woman saw how the action was precipitated by a modest serving girl. A retired drama teacher saw how the prophet staged the comeuppance of an arrogant officer as a comedy for an audience of foreign soldiers and Hebrew servants.
A young woman reading the first five books of Hebrew scripture could be forgiven if she thought that there's nothing in them for her. In Year One's reading for this week, "Character, Conflict, and Convenant in Israel's Original Traditions" (in Yee's book), the author Carolyn J. Sharp points out that men wrote the books and compiled them for instruction in male-only schools. I know from experience that 13-year-old boys resist reading about females except as objects of fun or danger.
So a young woman would see herself only rarely in the first five books. When women are mentioned, from Eve onward, they are presented as tempters, problems, or property whose value depends on childbearing. In stories and in laws, women are set apart as unclean, and a father or husband decides her fate.
Carolyn Sharp is writing for that young woman who looks for herself in scripture, telling her what other theologians have found between the lines. So, when Sharp writes about the portrayal of God as "Him," she tells us that theologians have long noted the feminine word for the "spirit" over the waters before Creation, and what theologians have sometimes seen in the phrase about God creating humankind in his own image, "male and female."
And so on through each of the first five books, Sharp points to clues in the text that the God of the Hebrew Bible can be seen as valuing women. For that hypothetical young woman reader, Sharp writes again and again what a feminist might see. Opening at random to pages 56-57, I see that Sharp tells us what a text offers, how we are invited to see a different perspective, how we may find a model for "resilience" and liberation in the story of Moses, what backstory we might reconstruct from the few references to Miriam as a leader.
While Sharp is at it, she also finds angles for others disturbed by what they find or can't find in Scripture. Disturbed by the slaughter of animals, and even more by the slaughter of whole families by Moses and the Levites at God's command? Unable to square the vengeful warrior God with our image of Jesus as a good shepherd? Not heterosexual male and seeing nothing about yourself except for two lines that condemn you? Sharp offers comfort, though it's sometimes just the balance from other scriptures "in dialogue" with the ones that bother you.
So let's read Sharp and the rest of Yee's book in the spirit that it's written. It offers ways for all of us to see ourselves in Scripture, and to see our neighbors in scripture, too.





