Living Faithfully in Your World:
1st yr: Scott 2nd yr: Marilyn, Pete, Nuno; 3rd yr, Susan; 4th yr, Christine. Mentors: Susan and Scott. Absent: None.
E-What echoes in your life?
F-Does anything ring as a false teaching or false truth? What frustrated you?
G-Where did you see generosity or God in your reading or reflections?
H-What seems to be “heavy?
Our starting point was about how the words of scripture are to be "chewed and digested." We had trouble digesting the words exigesis and hermeneutics, settling on the idea that one is about digging into the origins of the text, and the other is about what the words were/are intended to mean. Scott enjoyed learning that "Bush" (as in "the burning...") is a pun on the name "Sinai," another place where Moses encountered "I am Who I am." We were also daunted by the sheer number of different critical approaches to ancient texts, though we appreciated how a combination of these can help us to get at different sides to a text: they are "different keys to different doors."
Nuno put in a good word for the Apocrypha, since Powell didn't. The variety of kinds of writers in the NT amazed us. The layers of meanings of the word "evil" kind of overwhelmed Ford's chapter on the subject. MacDonough's chapter on the empire was definitely overwhelming, even for someone familiar with it.
Scott also took this unattributed note: “Catholic and Apostolic” explanation down through the generations – love the connection through the network in time – Like dogs being under the same blanket and all hearing the same things in the earth and neighborhood!
Nuno's comment summarized what we heard: "Grace can redeem suffering."
Pete brings worship and a check-in question. Scott brings a source for theological reflection.





