Our discussion of the reading brought out these thoughts:
- dust, tides, and roads: too many metaphors muddy the ideas
- Hughes's gender-balanced language for the Trinity struck us as interesting, not necessary. "Fount" for "Father"; "Sophia" for "Word" ; "she" with "Spirit".
- In any case, we agreed that our experience of the Trinity is more important and more palpable than the metaphors
- While Scott appreciated the author's contrast of how ancients (right up to the last century) saw a universe in stasis, God up and Hell down with how we see the cosmos in constant flux today, Erica questioned whether this new science would itself be replaced by another view in another decade or two, because that seems to happen a lot.
- We discussed the way communion puts us in touch with previous generations and distant Christians
- We noted cycles again, from wholeness to brokenness to judgement and new wholeness - creation / sin / judgment / redemption of the TRs. We considered how cycles in our theology compare to the cycles presented in Buddhism.
- The author's recommendations of centering prayer and the Jesus prayer brought discussion of how the cycles built into our liturgy can affect us: Scharme recommended centering prayer; Scott spoke of singing the Jesus prayer
