For our worship, Scott screen-shared a selection from Daily Devotions, "In the Early Evening," the
Book of Common Prayer p.139, including the collect for Tuesday in Holy Week, April 7, p. 220.
Scott asked that everyone from now on post responses to readings before we meet. Taking some time to do that, and time again to read everyone else's comments, will allow us more of our hour of Zoom for worship and reflection. Henceforth, Scott will post a blank blog on Saturday for the next week's meeting for everyone to add their comments about their reading.
Yr. C theme: Living as Spiritually Mature Christians
Class: Matt, Pete, first year; Christine, second year; Mariel, Gene, third year; Erica, fourth year; Scott and Susan, co - mentors. Absent: Christine.
In our discussion...
- Matt volunteered that God's character in the Book of Job is dynamic, as if God is influenced by Job's words. In Job, Matt and Pete agreed, it's as if Job puts God on trial.
- Pete was fascinated by the three so-called friends who cannot accept that Job is suffering for nothing, as they tell Job, "You must have done something wrong." In the end, when God wants to punish them for their wrong-headedness, Job asks forgiveness for them.
- Later, Pete saw the friends' simplistic view represented in Proverbs, where goodness is always rewarded and badness is always punished. Matt and Pete saw a range of views of God in the three "wisdom" books of Job, Proverbs, and Ecclesiastes.
- Mariel, reporting from MacCulloch, picked up on the motif of a trial in a section on the Enlightenment called "God in the Dock," i.e., on trial. She read from a popularly circulated manuscript "The Three Impostors" -- what we'd call today a viral meme -- that mocked religious faith.
- Gene, responding to the same chapter, ran through intellectual highlights of the Enlightenment: Spinoza and Deism (a Creator God neutral or disinterested in our lives), Rousseau (humanity born good but distorted by insitutions), the rise of Nationalism, and an attitude towards gender not so enlightened. Mariel and Susan added that a literalistic view of Scripture arose as a reaction to both the earlier allegorical interpretations and challenges of scientific materialism.
- Erica drew from the remarks that she had already posted on our blog. She wondered if the book Our Neighbor's Faith aims at a target audience from a generation older than hers, who, in her experience, harbor mistrust of Jews, and perhaps also of other faiths. Her favorite chapter so far gave her a wider introduction to Hinduism than she has had before.
Theological Reflection
Matt shared a photo from Instagram that had received a lot of local "likes," a close-up of a hand-written sign seen in the Marietta Square. The anonymous sign-maker observed that the whole world is staying home to protect the weak and the needy, and concluded, "Nothing in the whole history of mankind ever felt more like love than this."
Mariel suggested that we respond to this as a "position."
After negative initial responses, we did our best to enter into the sign-writer's way of looking at Creation. We intuited a view focused on finding what's good in the Here and Now (without awareness, apparently, of Elsewhere and Other Times).
When we contemplated Sin and Judgment, we intuited that the sign-maker would feel rage against the sin of not conforming to the sign-maker's idea of "sheltering in place." For this, we drew on our own recent experiences in grocery stores and on social media.
What emerged as we looked for "redemption" in this world view was an attitude shift to balance subjective feeling with objective fact, and to widen the frame of reference to include history and the Christian tradition.
Our opinion of the sign-maker seemed to soften as we found many times in our own lives when we had approached others from a doctrinaire position. For one example, a mother's doctrine about corporal punishment changed with the experience of rearing chidren and of seeing those grown children with children of their own. Judgmental thoughts were suspended at a recent visit to see parents crowding MUST Ministries to find food for their families. Another admitted, "Every time I've ever said
I'll never, eventually
I do."
As we looked through cultural analogs and those in our tradition, we found examples of both naive Pollyannas and courageous, self-sacrificing saints. We found that the Pharisees fit the bill for their hope that doctrinaire conformity would lead God's people out of enslavement to the Romans to restoration, as promised in scripture. (Here, they echoed the sentiments of Proverbs.)
What was so bad about the Pharisees? While the Pharisees loved the law, Jesus loved the people for whom the law was created; while the Pharisees insisted on the letter of the law, Jesus acted on the spirit of the law. The Pharisees, someone said, had "lost that lovin' feelin'." Our theological reflection brought us to a new appreciation for the ways diverse circumstances lead to diverse approaches to serving God and our community.
When Mariel read this prayer, Susan said that we'd already found the perfect collect:
In the Morning, BCP p. 461
This is another day, O Lord. I know not what it will bring forth, but make me ready, Lord, for whatever it may be. If I am to stand up, help me to stand bravely. If I am to sit still, help me to sit quietly. If I am to lie low, help me to do it patiently. And if I am to do nothing, let me do it gallantly. Make these words more than words, and give the Spirit of Jesus. Amen
Christine composed a collect based on wisdom literature and Job:
O God of wisdom, we are an imperfect people, through Your love you gave us Job as an example whose eyes you opened to your greatness. Help us to see as Job did through our own trials so that we too may see your greatness loving all those in our midst and serving You. Amen
Scott concluded with the final collect from Compline.
Next Meeting: Gene will lead worship via Zoom, and Pete will provide a source for our TR.